As we shall see, the better view is that the book was written sometime between 56-70 A. and is primarily concerned with the church's victory over the persecutions of Nero and the Jews, and the destruction of Jerusalem by Rome. Mark 16:9-20 are missing in only two, and these two manuscripts are probably the worst in our possession (the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus).
Early dating of revelation Adult female cams
Where these books are present, Revelation is captioned and entitled thus: “The Revelation which was made by God to John the evangelist in the island of Patmos, into which he was thrown by Nero Caesar.” Thus, from the oldest and most important versions in our possession comes unequivocal testimony placing the Revelation in the time of Nero.
Church Fathers As previously noted, several patristic writers give testimony for an early dating of Revelation.
There are several versions of the Syriac in our possession, including the Peshitto ("simple"), the Curetonian, the Philoexenian, and Harclean.
The oldest of these lacks the books of II Peter, II and III Jno., Jude and the Revelation.
Arethas makes similar comments, and states concerning Rev.
7:4 “When the evangelist received these oracles, the destruction in which the Jews were involved was not yet inflicted by the Romans.” Theophlact, in his preface to his commentary on John, places the apostle’s banishment 32 years after the Ascension of Christ, squarely in the reign of Nero. Despite the impressive array of external authorities that may be cited for the earlier date, it is the internal testimony of the book itself that is most important for it bears clear and unequivocal evidence that it was written before the siege of Jerusalem.To argue as do some that the subject of the verb is the apocalypse is purely arbitrary.In fairness, either John or the apocalypse may be the subject.Irenaeus was a church father of the second century, many of whose letters have come down to us.Concerning the mystic number of the beast given Revelation , Irenaeus says thus: "If it were necessary to have his name distinctly announced at the present time it would doubtless have been announced by him who saw the apocalypse; for it was not a great while ago that (it or he) was seen, but almost in our own generation, toward the end of Domitian's reign."  It should be observed that the subject of the verb "was seen" is ambiguous, and may be understood to refer to either John or the apocalypse.4:3), the apostasy of the church at Ephesus and those John wrote of disproves the notion that the conditions described in Revelation "must" be assigned to a later date.